Bogosian et al v. All American Concessions et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Bogosian et al v. All American Concessions et al

Bogosian et al v. All American Concessions et al

Case Number:	1:2006cv01633
Filed:	April 7, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	I. Leo Glasser
Presiding Judge:	Robert M. Levy
Nature of Suit:	Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 18, 2012	Filing 89 ORDER granting 86 Motion for Attorney Fees: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, Restaurant's motion for attorneys fees and costs on its cross-claim for indemnity against All American and Rosen is GRANTED in its en tirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter an Amended Judgment in favor of Restaurant and against All American and Rosen, jointly and severally, in the amount of $169,876.38. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 5/18/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
September 26, 2011	Filing 84 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 81 Motion for Summary Judgment: For the reasons stated in this Memorandum and Order, Restaurant's motion for summary judgment on its cross-claim for indemnity against All American and Rosen is GRANTED in its ent irety, and judgment shall enter in favor of Restaurant and as against All American and Rosen, jointly and severally, in the amount of $92,000. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Should Restaurant wish to press its a pplication for attorney's fees and costs, it shall submit within 14 days of the entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 54(d)(2)(b) a supplemental request together with contemporaneous time and billing records supporting the amount sought. Any opposition shall be filed within seven (7) days after the submission of Restaurant's supplemental request. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/26/2011. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 18, 2012

Filing 89 ORDER granting 86 Motion for Attorney Fees: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, Restaurant's motion for attorneys fees and costs on its cross-claim for indemnity against All American and Rosen is GRANTED in its en tirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter an Amended Judgment in favor of Restaurant and against All American and Rosen, jointly and severally, in the amount of $169,876.38. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 5/18/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

September 26, 2011

Filing 84 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 81 Motion for Summary Judgment: For the reasons stated in this Memorandum and Order, Restaurant's motion for summary judgment on its cross-claim for indemnity against All American and Rosen is GRANTED in its ent irety, and judgment shall enter in favor of Restaurant and as against All American and Rosen, jointly and severally, in the amount of $92,000. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Should Restaurant wish to press its a pplication for attorney's fees and costs, it shall submit within 14 days of the entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 54(d)(2)(b) a supplemental request together with contemporaneous time and billing records supporting the amount sought. Any opposition shall be filed within seven (7) days after the submission of Restaurant's supplemental request. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/26/2011. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bogosian et al v. All American Concessions et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?