Chepilko v. City of New York et al
| 1:2006cv05491 |
| September 29, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Allyne R. Ross |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
150
OPINION & ORDER: Defendants' 137 renewed motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant City of New York is dismissed from the action, and plaintiff's claims unconditional conditions of confinement a nd due process violations are dismissed as against all defendants. Plaintiff's claim for false arrest is dismissed as to defendants Kennedy and Bums and plaintiff's claim for failure to intervene is dismissed with respect to Kennedy. Pla intiffs remaining claims may proceed to trial in accordance with this opinion. The parties are directed to appear before the Court for a conference on Thursday, February 16,2012, at 10:30 p.m. in Courtroom 8C. SO ORDERED by Senior Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 2/6/2012. Copy mailed by Chambers to pro se Plaintiff. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER: On the final deadline for the parties to complete all discovery in this case, plaintiff moves to extend the deadline for discovery and to compel defendants to produce the names of the police officers who participated in his arrest, provide swo rn answers to interrogatories, and appear for a deposition. Plaintiff's 106 motions to compel and to further extend discovery are denied. If defendants intend to move for summary judgment, counsel shall write to Judge Ross by 10/29/2010 to request a pre-motion conference. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 10/20/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER [ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION]: Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I hereby adopt the 104 Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, plaintiff's 101 motion to amend the complaint is denied. The parties shall complete all remaining discovery in this case by 10/15/2010. If defendants intend to move for summary judgment, counsel shall write a letter requesting a pre-motion conference by 10/29/2010. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 9/27/2010) C/mailed by Chambers. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER endorsed on doc.# 92 : The application is granted. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 5/17/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER endorsed on doc. 89 : The application is granted. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 2/12/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER endorsed on defendants' 87 request for a Stay: The application is granted. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 12/29/2009) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER endorsed on doc.# 85 : The application is granted. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 11/19/2009) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chepilko v. City of New York et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
