Anderson v. Marshall
Petitioner: Tyrone Anderson
Respondent: Luis Marshall
Case Number: 1:2008cv04214
Filed: October 16, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Charles P. Sifton
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER & OPINION. The 1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied, and the Court denies petitioner's request for a Certificate of Appealability. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. SO ORDERED by Senior Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 11/3/2011. (Forwarded for Judgment) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tyrone Anderson
Represented By: Jonathan M. Kratter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Luis Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?