Hernandez et al v. NJK Contractors, Inc. et al
Case Number: 1:2009cv04812
Filed: November 5, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Labor: Fair Standards Office
Presiding Judge: Andrew L. Carter
Presiding Judge: Allyne R. Ross
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:201 Denial of Overtime Compensation

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 128 ORDER granting 127 Motion for Attorney Fees: For the reasons contained in the attached Summary Order, the Court hereby finds Defendants Nick Hatzis, Kostas Georgiadis, and NJK Contractors, Inc. jointly and severally liable for $429,683.00 in attorney's fees and $8699.25 in costs and fees. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. on 9/3/2015. (Stevens, Alexis)
May 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 121 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: See the attached document for the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 5/15/2015 advising the Court as to how they intend to proceed, particularly with respect to the issue of attorneys' fees. The Court strongly urges the parties to meet and confer and agree to the amount of Plaintiffs' attorneys' fees. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. on 5/1/2015. (Stevens, Alexis)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hernandez et al v. NJK Contractors, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?