Ashbaugh v. Windsor Capital Group, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Janet Ashbaugh
Defendant: Marriott International Inc., and Windsor Capital Group, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2010cv04647
Filed: October 8, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge: I. Leo Glasser
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER granting 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to all of Ashbaugh's claims, and her complaint is dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge I. Leo Glasser on 6/18/2012. (Riley, Paul)
April 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER: Plaintiff requests a third extension of time to complete discovery in this case. 30 Defendants oppose plaintiff's request. 32 The Court held a conference on April 11, 2012 to address plaintiff's request. For the reasons stated on the record, plaintiff's request for an extension of time to complete discovery is denied. See attached Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 4/12/2012. (Turilli, Michael)
April 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, Pltff. filed a Ntc. of voluntary discontinuance of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), dtd. 4/18/11, (Docket #11), relying upon the referenced Rule, the Court endorsed "So Ordered" on that Notice on 4/21/11 . Later that day, a letter from the deft received in Chambers called the Court's attention to the fact that he was never served w/ the Notice of Dismissal notwithstanding the declaration under the penalty of perjury at the end of it that it was served via fax and regular mail upon defse counsel. (Docket #12). The Court was thus misled by the pltff's Notice and his voluntary dismissal was erroneously "So Ordered." A status conf. was convened to address that issue. The pltff� 39;s attorney adamantly refused to acknowledge his misleading reference to the Rule and is hereby ordered to show cause on 5/4/11, why Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(b)(2) has not been violated. ORDER REOPENING CASE, The Order dated 4/21/11, authorizing the volunta ry dismissal is hereby vacated and the viability of that action is hereby reinstated. (Show Cause Hearing set for 5/4/2011 at 4:00 PM in Courtroom 8B South before Senior Judge I. Leo Glasser). So Ordered by Senior Judge I. Leo Glasser on 4/27/2011. (Layne, Monique)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ashbaugh v. Windsor Capital Group, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janet Ashbaugh
Represented By: Elliot B. Pasik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marriott International Inc.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Windsor Capital Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?