Cajamarca v. Regal Entertainment Group et al
| Veronica Cajamarca |
| Otis Gadsden and Regal Entertainment Group |
| 1:2011cv02780 |
| June 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Brian M. Cogan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. The Court grants defendants' motion to the extent of imposing a $3,000 sanction on plaintiffs counsel, payable to defendant's counsel within 7 days hereof, with proof of payment filed in this action. Plaintiff's counsel's failure to comply with this order will result in judgment being entered against him. In addition, defendants' bill of costs is unopposed, and the Court finds the costs claimed to be reasonable. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for costs against plaintiff in the amount of $3,683.15. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 8/31/2012. Forwarded for judgment. (Siegfried, Evan)
|
|
Filing
29
CORRECTED MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted. Plaintiff's federal claims are dismissed with prejudice and her state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 5/31/2012. (Siegfried, Evan)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
