Janus v. Regalis Construction, Inc. et al
| Andrzej Janus |
| Jan Pomianek and Regalis Construction, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv05788 |
| November 29, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Viktor V. Pohorelsky |
| Allyne R. Ross |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
OPINION & ORDER [ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION]: Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error and hereby adopt the 15 Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)( 1). Accordingly, plaintiff's 14 motion for default judgment is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff against both defendants as follows: (1) Awarding $ 494.00 in unpaid overtime and liqu idated damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq.; (2) $ 14,873.75 in unpaid overtime and liquidated damages under the New York Labor Law; (3) Prejudgment interest totaling $ 4,009.96 through 5/31/ 2012, plus an additional $ 2.38 per diem from 6/1/2012 through the date of judgment; (4) $ 10,280 in attorney's fees; and (5) $ 649.52 in costs. SO ORDERED by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 9/4/2012. C/mailed by Chambers. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
