S.A. v. New York City Department of Education

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District S.A. v. New York City Department of Education

S.A. v. New York City Department of Education

Plaintiff:	S.A.
Defendant:	New York City Department of Education
Case Number:	1:2012cv00435
Filed:	January 31, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Marilyn D. Go
Presiding Judge:	Roslynn R. Mauskopf
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 22, 2015	Filing 66 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion for Attorney Fees: The reference to Magistrate Judge Go for a Report and Recommendation is withdrawn, and plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney's Fees is granted in part and d enied in part. This Court awards attorneys' fees of $66,104.49 and costs in the amount of $2,698.58. All other relief sought is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/22/2015. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
March 30, 2014	Filing 47 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 45 Motion for Leave to File. For the reasons stated in the attached Memor andum and Order, With respect to all issues other than compensatory parental training, the SRO's decision is affirmed, plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is denied, and DOE's cross-motion for summary judgment is granted. However, to the extent the SRO annulled the IHO's award of compensatory parental training, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted, DOE's cross-motion for summary judgment is denied; as such, the SRO's decision is reversed in part, a nd the IHO's award of compensatory training is reinstated. The Court orders the parties to confer and submit within 14 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order a proposed judgment consistent with the Court's ruling herein. The Court further orders the parties to confer on the subject of attorneys fees in an effort to reach an agreement. In the absence of such agreement, the parties are to notify the Court no later than June 1, 2014, and propose a briefing schedule on the application. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/30/2014. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 22, 2015

Filing 66 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion for Attorney Fees: The reference to Magistrate Judge Go for a Report and Recommendation is withdrawn, and plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney's Fees is granted in part and d enied in part. This Court awards attorneys' fees of $66,104.49 and costs in the amount of $2,698.58. All other relief sought is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/22/2015. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

March 30, 2014

Filing 47 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 45 Motion for Leave to File. For the reasons stated in the attached Memor andum and Order, With respect to all issues other than compensatory parental training, the SRO's decision is affirmed, plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is denied, and DOE's cross-motion for summary judgment is granted. However, to the extent the SRO annulled the IHO's award of compensatory parental training, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted, DOE's cross-motion for summary judgment is denied; as such, the SRO's decision is reversed in part, a nd the IHO's award of compensatory training is reinstated. The Court orders the parties to confer and submit within 14 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order a proposed judgment consistent with the Court's ruling herein. The Court further orders the parties to confer on the subject of attorneys fees in an effort to reach an agreement. In the absence of such agreement, the parties are to notify the Court no later than June 1, 2014, and propose a briefing schedule on the application. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/30/2014. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: S.A. v. New York City Department of Education
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Department of Education
Represented By:	Emily Sweet
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: S.A.
Represented By:	Gary S. Mayerson
Represented By:	Tracey Spencer Walsh
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?