Stokes v. Bridge Street Development Corp. et al
| Angela P. Stokes |
| Bridge Street Development Corp. and Rhonda A. Lewis |
| 1:2012cv05713 |
| November 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Brian M. Cogan |
| Roanne L. Mann |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER, Pltff is directed to file an amended complaint and include a statement of claim to support both her Title VII and ADEA claims within 20 days from the entry of this Order. If pltff elects to file an amended complaint, it shall be captioned "AMENDED COMPLAINT" and bear the docket number 12-cv-5713 (BMC). The amended complaint must be served on defts and shall completely replace the original complaint. Furthermore, pltff should attach to her amended complai nt, a copy of the charge of discrimination she filed on or about 9/28/10 with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Although pltff paid the filing fee to commence this action, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 USC sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. (Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 11/27/2012) c/m with Unpublished Decision by chambers. (Galeano, Sonia)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
