Gardenhire v. Staples The Office Superstore East, Inc. et al

Defendant: Staples the Office Superstore, LLC and Staples The Office Superstore East, Inc.
Plaintiff: Floresse Gardenhire
Case Number: 1:2013cv01530
Filed: March 22, 2013
Court: New York Eastern District Court
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Raymond J. Dearie
Referring Judge: James Orenstein
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gardenhire v. Staples The Office Superstore East, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Staples the Office Superstore, LLC
Represented By: Allison C. Leibowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Staples The Office Superstore East, Inc.
Represented By: Allison C. Leibowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Floresse Gardenhire
Represented By: Lisa Lynn Grieco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.