Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security

Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Anisha M. Moore
 
Case Number: 1:2013cv01867
Filed: April 4, 2013
 
Court: New York Eastern District Court
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Dora Lizette Irizarry
 
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download.
Date Filed#Document Text
April 22, 2013 13 Featured Case ORDER denying 12 Motion to Transfer Venue and for Recusal - This motion filed by pro se plaintiff was improperly classified as a motion for a more definite statement. In essence it was a motion to transfer this social security appeal to t he U.S. District Court for the Southern District of NY ("SDNY"), which had originally transferred the case to this court. Moreover, this court liberally construed the motion as one for recusal. For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WR ITTEN SUMMARY ORDER, Plaintiff's motion requesting transfer of the instant action back to the SDNY and recusal is denied. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and, therefor e, in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order to pro se plaintiff. The briefing schedule previously set by the court on April 8, 2013 remains in effect. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 4/22/2013. (Irizarry, Dora)
July 21, 2014 45 Featured Case AMENDING ORDER granting 21 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction -- The Written Summary Order was inadvertently not attached to the Order of Dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies just issued by the Court. It is attached he reto. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See, Coppedge v. United States , 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of the Attached Written Summary Order and this Electronic Order to pro se plaintiff and to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 7/21/2014.. Ordered by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 7/21/2014. (Irizarry, Dora)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Thomas Gray
Represented By: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anisha M. Moore
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]