Chan v. Donahoe
||Patrick R. Donahoe
||Fun K. Chan
||April 30, 2013
||New York Eastern District Court
||Jack B. Weinstein
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Jobs
|Cause of Action:
||42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 5, 2014
MEMORANDUM, ORDER & JUDGMENT granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant's motions for summary judgment regarding plaintiff's national origin, race and age discrimination claims are granted. The Po stmaster General's motion for summary judgment with respect to retaliation is denied. Trial shall start on March 9, 2015. A jury will be selected by a magistrate judge. In limine motions will be heard on March 2, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. By February 23, 2015, the parties shall each submit to the court a full proposed jury charge and verdict sheet, in limine motions, and any supporting briefs. They shall exchange and file with the court: (1) lists of pre-marked exhibits proposed for use at trial, together with copies of all exhibits; (2) lists of potential witnesses together with brief summaries of proposed testimony; and (3) stipulations with respect to all undisputed facts. Any disputes related to briefing schedules or discovery are respectfully referred to the magistrate judge. (Jury Trial set for 3/9/2015 in Courtroom 10B South before Judge Jack B. Weinstein.) Ordered by Judge Jack B. Weinstein on 12/4/2014. (Barrett, C)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.