McEarchen et al v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Plaintiff: Daniel Lawson, Jeffrey McEarchen and Thomas C. Wolfe
Defendant: Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2013cv03569
Filed: June 24, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Frederic Block
Presiding Judge: James Orenstein
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 277 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons set forth above, the Court adopts Judge Orenstein's thorough and well-reasoned R&R(Doc. No. 268 ). It is hereby ordered that the plaintiffs' motion for final certification is denied , and, accordingly, that Urban's motion to decertify the collective action is granted. (Doc. No. 242 ). In addition, the statute of limitations is hereby tolled for sixty (60) days following the issuance of this Memorandum and Order.This case is re-committed to Magistrate Judge Orenstein for all further pre-trial proceedings. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/6/2017. (Taronji, Robert)
September 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 113 MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Urbans motion 87 is denied and the Order is affirmed. See attached memorandum & order for details. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 9/24/2014. (Innelli, Michael)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McEarchen et al v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Lawson
Represented By: Rachel Berlin
Represented By: Charles Gershbaum
Represented By: Marc Scott Hepworth
Represented By: Seth R. Lesser
Represented By: Michael John Palitz
Represented By: Mathew Allen Parker
Represented By: David A. Roth
Represented By: Fran L. Rudich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey McEarchen
Represented By: Rachel Berlin
Represented By: Charles Gershbaum
Represented By: Marc Scott Hepworth
Represented By: Seth R. Lesser
Represented By: Michael John Palitz
Represented By: Mathew Allen Parker
Represented By: David A. Roth
Represented By: Fran L. Rudich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas C. Wolfe
Represented By: Rachel Berlin
Represented By: Charles Gershbaum
Represented By: Marc Scott Hepworth
Represented By: Seth R. Lesser
Represented By: Michael John Palitz
Represented By: Mathew Allen Parker
Represented By: David A. Roth
Represented By: Fran L. Rudich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Represented By: William R. Horwitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?