Pugh v. Wright et al
| Thomas Pugh |
| Parole Officer John Doe Unzel, Parole Officer Melinda Dixon, Supervisor Parole Officer and Anthony Wright |
| 1:2013cv07350 |
| December 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Allyne R. Ross |
| Vera M. Scanlon |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER [DISMISSING CASE]: The Court granted plaintiff leave to amend his complaint, but he has not yet filed an amended complaint. On 3/17/2014, the Court received plaintiff's 12 request that this action be held in abeyance whi le a "New York State Habeas Corpus" is pending in the New York State Court, Queens County. Plaintiff has not indicated the scope or the purpose of the state court proceeding, or suggested how the state proceeding may impact this federa l action. The instant complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may move to reopen this case under the same docket number within one year, pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 4/10/2014. C/mailed by Chambers. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
