Liew et al v. Cohen & Slamowitz, LLP et al
| Elizabeth K Atwood, Khurram Kayani and Wai Hoe Liew |
| David A. Cohen, Cohen & Slamowitz, LLP, Esq. Mitchell Selip and Mitchell G. Slamowitz |
| 1:2014cv04868 |
| August 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Marilyn D. Go |
| Kiyo A. Matsumoto |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order defendants' motion to dismiss 52 is granted in part and denied in part as follows: (1) All class claims asserted by the three named plaintiffs are dismissed; (2) Th e individual claims by Ms. Atwood and Mr. Liew are dismissed; and (3) Mr. Kayani has stated plausible individual claims. Counsel for the remaining parties are directed to confer and submit a joint status report by April 14, 2017, advising the court how they wish to proceed with the litigation. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 4/6/2017. (Fletcher, Camille)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum and Order, defendants motion to disqualify Mr. Pashkin as counsel for plaintiffs is hereby granted. Plaintiffs are granted 30 days to obtain new counsel,who shall file a notice of appearance in this action. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 9/22/2015. (Gong, LiJia)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
