OneWest Bank N.A. v. Dimitratos et al
| OneWest Bank N.A. |
| Citifinancial Company (DE), George Dimitratos, Zaharoula Dimitratos, John Doe No. 1 through John Doe No. 10 and Slomins, Inc. |
| 1:2014cv05027 |
| August 25, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Nicholas G. Garaufis |
| Robert M. Levy |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The court ADOPTS IN PART the January 28, 2016, R&R and, accordingly, GRANTS Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, GRANTS Plaintiffs motion for judgment of foreclosure and sale, and GRANTS WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's request to discontinue the action against the John Doe Defendants. The court departs from the January 28, 2016, R&R only in that the Dimitratos Defendants shall be given 90 days from the date of entry of this Order to vacate the premises. The court ADOPTS IN FULL the February 9, 2016, R&R and; accordingly, GRANTS Plaintiff's motion for default judgments against Citifinancial Company (DE) and Slomins, Inc. The Clerk of Court is respectfully DIRECTED to amend the caption to substitute CIT Bank, N.A. for One West Bank N.A., and enter judgment against all Defendants consistent with this Order. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 2/24/2016. (fwd'd for jgm) (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
