Liping Luo et al v. The UPS Store, Inc.
Plaintiff: Liping Luo and Global Access Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant: The UPS Store, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2014cv05318
Filed: September 11, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Edward R. Korman
Presiding Judge: Robert M. Levy
Nature of Suit: Contract:Franchise
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Liping Luo et al v. The UPS Store, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Liping Luo
Represented By: Terrence Joseph Worms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Global Access Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: Terrence Joseph Worms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The UPS Store, Inc.
Represented By: Peter Christopher Gourdine
Represented By: Gil Feder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?