Campbell v. Artus

Campbell v. Artus

Petitioner:	Erick Campbell
Respondent:	D. Artus
Case Number:	1:2014cv05594
Filed:	September 22, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Roslynn R. Mauskopf
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 29, 2019	Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Campbell's motion for discovery is denied without prejudice and Campbell is directed to show cause by affirmation, within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order, why the AEDPA statute of limi tations should not bar the instant petition. Campbell's affirmation should include any facts which would support statutory or equitable tolling of the statute of limitations, and he shall append to his affirmation documentary evidence, if availa ble, supporting his allegations. All further proceedings shall be stayed for sixty (60) days for Campbell to comply with this Order. If Campbell fails to comply with this Order within the time allowed, the instant petition shall be dismissed as time- barred. The Clerk of Court is directed to transmit to Campbell a copy of this Memorandum and Order and attached affirmation form, as well as a copy of his petition for writ of habeas corpus, respondents motion to dismiss and its attachments, and the docket sheet via U.S. Mail. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/29/2019. (Taronji, Robert)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 29, 2019

Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Campbell's motion for discovery is denied without prejudice and Campbell is directed to show cause by affirmation, within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order, why the AEDPA statute of limi tations should not bar the instant petition. Campbell's affirmation should include any facts which would support statutory or equitable tolling of the statute of limitations, and he shall append to his affirmation documentary evidence, if availa ble, supporting his allegations. All further proceedings shall be stayed for sixty (60) days for Campbell to comply with this Order. If Campbell fails to comply with this Order within the time allowed, the instant petition shall be dismissed as time- barred. The Clerk of Court is directed to transmit to Campbell a copy of this Memorandum and Order and attached affirmation form, as well as a copy of his petition for writ of habeas corpus, respondents motion to dismiss and its attachments, and the docket sheet via U.S. Mail. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/29/2019. (Taronji, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Campbell v. Artus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: D. Artus
Represented By:	Michelle Maerov
Represented By:	NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC
Represented By:	QUEENS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Erick Campbell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?