Cort v. Marshall's Department Store et al
| Caroline Cort |
| Tiariyani Frazier, Malondya Holt, Aliyah Johnson, Manager B, Marhsll's Department Store, Unknown Marshall's Manager A and Unknown Security Personel B |
| 1:2014cv07385 |
| December 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Nicholas G. Garaufis |
| Ramon E. Reyes |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM & ORDER re 36 Motion, For the reasons stated above. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 36) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully DIRECTED to enter judgment for Defendant and to close this case. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 12/18/2017. (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The motion is GRANTED. Given the nature of the factual gaps in the Complaint, Plaintiff may be able to cure some or all of the issues identified in the accompanying Me morandum and Order. Accordingly, the court grants Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry of the accompanying Memorandum and Order. If Plaintiff opts not to amend, the court will enter judgment in favor of Marshalls and close the case. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 12/29/2015. (Ezray, Evan)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
