Kramer v. Mahia
| Shahara Khan |
| Debra Kramer and Tozamell H Mahia |
| 1:2014mc01674 |
| December 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Pamela K. Chen |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: For the reasons in the attached and in the Court's September 30, 2015 Memorandum and Order, the Trustee's motion for prejudgment interest and costs is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter a f inal judgment consistent with the Court's September 30, 2015 Memorandum and Order in the sum of $64,190.25, which includes $26,690.25 in the amount of the Sale Proceeds Transfer and $37,500.00 in the amount of the Mortgage Proceeds Transfer, and close this case. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 11/10/2016. (Merin, Eric)
|
|
Filing
2
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached, the Court affirms and adopts Judge Stong's Memorandum Decision and Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law [Dkt. 1] in all respects. As recommended by Judge Stong, the Cour t orders that the Trustee's motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment and terminate this action. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 9/30/2015. (Pelaez, Jenny)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
