Edo v. Martini et al
| Enekan Edo |
| Detective Gallegher, Detective Martini and Jacquline Rizk |
| 1:2015cv00202 |
| January 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Carol Bagley Amon |
| Steven M. Gold |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: On November 10, 2014, plaintiff Enekan Edo commenced this action against Detectives Ronald Martiny and Daniel Gallagher of the New York City Police Department and Assistant District Attorney Jacqueline Rizk of the Queens County District Attorney's Office (collectively "defendants"). (D.E. # 1 ("Compl.").) On August 26, 2016, upon referral by this Court, Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Court grant summary judgment in favor of defendants. (D.E. # 77 ("R&R").) For the reasons stated below, the Court adopts the R&R as the opinion of the Court and denies Edo leave to file an amended complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and to close the case. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. (See attachment for further details). Ordered by Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 3/28/2017. (Basnight, Jasmine)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Edo's request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 is granted. Edo's § 1983 claims against A.D.A. Rizk are dismissed. Edo's remaining claims against all defendants may proceed as construed by the Court. The United States Marshals Service is directed to serve the summons and complaint upon defendants A.D.A. Rizk of the Queens County District Attorney's Office, and Detectives Martini and Gallegher of the 113th NYPD precinct in Queens, New York, without prepayment of Edo's fees. A courtesy copy of the complaint and this order shall be served upon the Corporation Counsel for the City of New York, Federal Liti gation Unit. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon, on 6/12/2015. C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
