Time Warner Cable of New York City LLC v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, Local Union No. 3

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Time Warner Cable of New York City LLC v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, Local Union No. 3

Time Warner Cable of New York City LLC v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, Local Union No. 3

Plaintiff:	Time Warner Cable of New York City LLC
Defendant:	International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, Local Union No. 3
Case Number:	1:2015cv00700
Filed:	February 11, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Steven M. Gold
Presiding Judge:	Jack B. Weinstein
Nature of Suit:	Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 22, 2015	Filing 38 MEMORANDUM & ORDER. Defendant's 14 MOTION to Dismiss the complaint without prejudice is granted. Plaintiff's 18 Cross-MOTION for summary judgment to confirm is dismissed without prejudice. Defendant's 26 Cross-MOTION for summ ary judgment to vacate on public policy grounds is dismissed without prejudice. Defendant's 26 Cross-MOTION for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on lack of a collective bargaining agreement is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's argument that defendant's motion to vacate the arbitral award as time barred is dismissed as moot; no final arbitration award has yet issued. Ordered by Judge Jack B. Weinstein on 5/21/2015. (Barrett, C)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 22, 2015

Filing 38 MEMORANDUM & ORDER. Defendant's 14 MOTION to Dismiss the complaint without prejudice is granted. Plaintiff's 18 Cross-MOTION for summary judgment to confirm is dismissed without prejudice. Defendant's 26 Cross-MOTION for summ ary judgment to vacate on public policy grounds is dismissed without prejudice. Defendant's 26 Cross-MOTION for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on lack of a collective bargaining agreement is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's argument that defendant's motion to vacate the arbitral award as time barred is dismissed as moot; no final arbitration award has yet issued. Ordered by Judge Jack B. Weinstein on 5/21/2015. (Barrett, C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Time Warner Cable of New York City LLC v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, Local Union No. 3
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, Local Union No. 3
Represented By:	Archer, Byington, Glennon & Levine, LLP
Represented By:	Marty Gerard Glennon
Represented By:	Robert T. McGovern
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Time Warner Cable of New York City LLC
Represented By:	Daniel Kirschbaum
Represented By:	Kenneth Alan Margolis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?