Johnson v. Robert N. Daveoren Complex

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Johnson v. Robert N. Daveoren Complex

Johnson v. Robert N. Daveoren Complex

Petitioner:	Rohan Johnson
Respondent:	Robert N. Daveoren Complex
Case Number:	1:2015cv00890
Filed:	February 17, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Roslynn R. Mauskopf
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 12, 2018	Filing 43 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the application of non-party Taquesha Jackson (Doc. No. 42) is granted, and the Court hereby ORDERS that each of the notices of pendency attached to this Order and filed in this action at Document Numbers 29 , 30 , and 31 , are CANCELLED, and further directs that the County Clerks of Queens, Kings, and Bronx Counties take the necessary steps to reflect this Court's cancellation of such notices in the records of their respective offices. The Clerk of this Court is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum and Order to petitioner Rohan Johnson at the address listed for him on the docket, and note the mailing on the docket. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 2/12/2018. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
March 21, 2016	Filing 36 JUDGMENT in favor of Robert N. Daveoren Complex against Rohan Johnson. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/21/2016. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 12, 2018

Filing 43 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the application of non-party Taquesha Jackson (Doc. No. 42) is granted, and the Court hereby ORDERS that each of the notices of pendency attached to this Order and filed in this action at Document Numbers 29 , 30 , and 31 , are CANCELLED, and further directs that the County Clerks of Queens, Kings, and Bronx Counties take the necessary steps to reflect this Court's cancellation of such notices in the records of their respective offices. The Clerk of this Court is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum and Order to petitioner Rohan Johnson at the address listed for him on the docket, and note the mailing on the docket. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 2/12/2018. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

March 21, 2016

Filing 36 JUDGMENT in favor of Robert N. Daveoren Complex against Rohan Johnson. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/21/2016. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Robert N. Daveoren Complex
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Rohan Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Robert N. Daveoren Complex
Represented By:	NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC
Represented By:	QUEENS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?