Delancey v. Lee

Delancey v. Lee

Petitioner:	Roger Delancey
Respondent:	William Lee
Case Number:	1:2015cv00891
Filed:	February 17, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge:	Roslynn R. Mauskopf
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 10, 2020	Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error. Finding none, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. See Covey v. Simonton , 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007). Accordingly, it isORDERED that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied and this action is dismissed. A certificate of appealability shall not issue because Delancey has not made a substan tial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order, mail a copy of the judgment and this Memorandum and Order to Delancey, to note that mailing on the docket sheet, and to close this case. Ordered by Chief Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 6/10/2020. (Taronji, Robert)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 10, 2020

Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error. Finding none, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. See Covey v. Simonton , 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007). Accordingly, it isORDERED that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied and this action is dismissed. A certificate of appealability shall not issue because Delancey has not made a substan tial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order, mail a copy of the judgment and this Memorandum and Order to Delancey, to note that mailing on the docket sheet, and to close this case. Ordered by Chief Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 6/10/2020. (Taronji, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Delancey v. Lee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Roger Delancey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: William Lee
Represented By:	NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC
Represented By:	QUEENS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?