Brown v. New York State Division of Parole and Community Supervision et al
| Kenneth Tyrone Brown, Sr. |
| Parole Officer Burke, Sr. Parole Officer Neely, New York City Department of Corrections, New York State Division of Parole and Community Supervision and The City of New York |
| 1:2015cv01278 |
| March 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Marilyn D. Go |
| Allyne R. Ross |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER re 16 Summons Returned Unexecuted, 17 Summons Returned Unexecuted. As set forth in the attached order, the Court requests that the Attorney General for the State of New York provide the full names of defendants Neely and Burke and correct address for service or agree to accept service on their behalf by June 8, 2015. Once this information is provided, the Court shall direct that summonses be issued, that service be made on the defendants, and the Amended Complaint be deemed amended t o reflect the full names of defendants Neely and Burke. The Clerk of Court is requested to send a copy of this order and the complaint to the New York State Attorney General and the plaintiff. No summons shall issue at this time. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 5/20/2015. (Proujansky, Josh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
