Guan v. Long Island Business Institute, Inc. et al
| Chun Lan Guan |
| Monica Foote and Long Island Business Institute, Inc. |
| 1:2015cv02215 |
| April 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Carol Bagley Amon |
| Vera M. Scanlon |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
268
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Court approves the parties motion for settlement approval. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 3/18/2020. (Fernandez, Erica)
|
|
Filing
250
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Scanlon's Sanctions Order and Troy Law's objections, and finds that the decision is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Accordingly, Troy Law's objections are dismissed and the Sanctions Order is affirmed. Ordered by Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 8/9/2019. (Fernandez, Erica)
|
|
Filing
123
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For these reasons, the Court grants plaintiffs' motion for conditional collective-action certification as limited above and denies without prejudice defendants' request to exclude opt-in plaintiff Yu from the collective action (see order for details). Ordered by Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 8/11/2016. (Fernandez, Erica)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
