Ralin v. The City of New York et al
| Brad Ralin |
| J.A. Hunte, John and Jane Doe, Michael Sileo, R. Simmons, The City of New York, The New York City Department of Finance and The New York City Police Department |
| 1:2015cv02978 |
| May 21, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Steven M. Gold |
| Kiyo A. Matsumoto |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. For the reasons stated in the attached Order, the court respectfully denies plaintiff's objections to the R&R, and adopts Judge Tiscione's R&R in its entirety, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)( 1). Accordingly, the court GRANTS defendants' motion to dismiss. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants; send plaintiff copies of this decision, the judgment, and an appeals packet; note service on the docket; and close this case. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 9/30/2017. (Tata, Vivek)
|
|
Filing
38
Memorandum and Order. ORDER denying 29 Motion for Recusal. For the reasons stated in the attached memorandum, plaintiff's motion for recusal is denied. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to serve a copy of this order on the pro se plaintiff and note service on the docket. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 5/25/2016. (Fletcher, Camille)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
