Rates Technology Inc. v. Google Inc.
Plaintiff Rates Technology Inc. alleges that defendant Google Inc.'s Google Talk VoIP services infringe on U.S. Patent No. 5,425,085 entitled "Least cost routing device for separate connection into phone line" related to minimizing the cost of placing long distance telephone calls.
| Rates Technology Inc. |
| Google Inc. |
| Google Inc. |
| Rates Technology Inc. |
| 2:2005cv04703 |
| October 5, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Suffolk |
| E. Thomas Boyle |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER Re: Proposed Corrected Stipulation of Dismissal - Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and with th approval of the Court that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to any party. The Court will retain jurisdiction over the enforcement of the settlement agreement. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 4/6/06). (Coleman, Laurie)
|
| Filing 16 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct Stipulation and Order of Dismissal by Rates Technology Inc.. (Hicks, James) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION of Dismissal Corrected Stipulation with Prejudice by Rates Technology Inc.. (Hicks, James) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice by Rates Technology Inc.. (Hicks, James) |
|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER: The initial conference previously set for March 17, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. before the undersigned has been rescheduled for April 17, 2006 at 11:00 a.m. at the Alfonse M. D'Amato U.S. Courthouse, Courtroom 830, Central Islip, New York. All counsel shall be present. SEE order for further details.Ordered by Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 3/3/06. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order on all parties upon receipt.(Joy, Dolores)
|
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Google Inc.. (Hohenthaner, Jon) |
| Filing 11 Defendant Google Inc.'s ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand, COUNTERCLAIM against Rates Technology Inc. by Google Inc..(Hohenthaner, Jon) |
|
ORDER granting 9 Motion to Continue. The initial conference is adjourned to March 17, 2006 at 9:30 a.m., based on the representation made by Google's counsel that defendant Google has never been served. Plaintiff's request for a settlement conference is denied, without prejudice to renewal at the initial conference. Ordered by Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 1/17/06. Defendant's counsel is directed to notify all parties of this order upon receipt. (Joy, Dolores)
|
| Filing 10 Letter to the Hon. E. Thomas Boyle regarding a response to Jon Hohenthaner's letter dated January 10, 2006 by Rates Technology Inc.. (Hicks, James) |
| Filing 9 First MOTION to Continue Initial Scheduling Conference by Google Inc.. (Hohenthaner, Jon) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Re: 7 Consent to Change Attorney - The law firm of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP is substituted as attorneys of record for plaintiff Rates Technology, Inc., in the above-entitled action in place and stead of Ervin, Cohen & Jessup LLP as of the date herof. (Signed by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 12/6/05). C/ECF.(Coleman, Laurie)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Consent to Change Attorney by James B. Hicks (Hicks, James) |
|
ORDER granting 6 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice as to attorney James B. Hicks. Mr. Hicks shall register for ECF. Registration is available online at the E.D.N.Y. homepage. Once registered, Mr. Hicks shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Ordered by Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 11/17/05. (Joy, Dolores)
|
| Filing 6 Amended MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Rates Technology Inc.. (Lazer, David) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/15/2005 (Coleman, Laurie). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying 4 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice. Under Local Civil Rule 1.3(c), a court certificate, issued by the court within thirty (30) days, is required. A certificate issued by the state bar association is not sufficient. Moreover, the certificate is dated August 11, 2005. For these reasons, the pro hac vice application on behalf of James B. Hicks does not comply and is denied, without prejudice to renewal. Ordered by JudgeE. Thomas Boyle on 10/27/05. (Joy, Dolores)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Rates Technology Inc.. (Lazer, David) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Initial Conference set for 2/3/2006 09:30 AM before Magistrate-Judge E. Thomas Boyle. See order for further instructions; Counsel for Plaintiff(s) or Plaintiff pro se is obligated to serve a copy of this order on each defendant.. Ordered by Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 10/19/05. (Lundy, Lisa)
|
| Filing 2 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent, Trademark or Copyright Infringement. (Serret, Liliana) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Rec #17745) against Google Inc. $ 250, filed by Rates Technology Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Serret, Liliana) |
| Summons Issued as to Google Inc.. (Serret, Liliana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
