Conte v. Newsday, Inc. et al
Case Number: 2:2006cv04859
Filed: September 7, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bianco
Presiding Judge: E. Thomas Boyle
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 507 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. For the reasons stated herein, the Court grants the Newsday defendants' motion for summary judgment and the Consumer defendants' motion for summary judgment with respect to plaintiff's Lanham Act claims. The Cou rt declines to exercise supplemental authority over plaintiff's remaining state law claims the libel and tortious interference with contract claims alleged against the Newsday defendants and the fraud claim brought against the Consumer defendan ts and the Consumer defendants' state law cross-claim and dismisses those claims without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case and enter judgment accordingly. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 3/13/2013. (Samplin, Ilissa)
January 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 462 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff's expert, Mr. Pulchin, and Ms. Averin of Metis Group LLC, are awarded the sum of $6,650 as a reasonable fee for time spent in responding to discovery under Rule 26(b)(4)(A). See Rule 26(b)(4)(E), Fed. R. Civ. P. SEE order for further details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 1/9/2012. Defendants' counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order on plaintiff upon receipt. (c/f, c/m to pro se plaintiff) (Joy, Dolores)
August 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 399 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 395 Motion for Discovery. Defendants Motion to conduct expert depositions at a reasonable fee is granted to the limited extent provided above, and without prejudice to the filing of a motion to set that fee following the completion of such depositions in the event that the parties are unable to reach an agreement. SEE Order for further details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 8/10/2011. (Bacchus, Michael)
July 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 392 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 383 Motion for Discovery. Consumer Defendants motion to strike the plaintiffs expert report is DENIED and the request for an extension of time is GRANTED to the extent that any rebuttal report of said def endants shall be served and filed within fourteen (14) days from the date herein. Plaintiff is ORDERED to supplement his amended expert report within five (5) days of the date of this order. SEE Order for further details. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 7/7/2011. (Bacchus, Michael)
March 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 234 ORDER denying 211 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 212 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 214 Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, defendants' motio ns are granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, defendants' motions to dismiss are granted with respect to plaintiff's RICO, Sherman Act, ECPA, and injurious falsehoods claims. The Newsday defendants' motion to dismiss plain tiff's slander claim is granted. Defendants' motions to dismiss plaintiff's defamation claims are denied in all other respects. Defendant Dennis Springer's motion to dismiss all claims against him is granted. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 3/25/2010. (Alexander, John)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conte v. Newsday, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?