Neal v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Neal v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Defendant:	JPMorgan Chase Bank
Case Number:	2:2010cv01157
Filed:	March 15, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge:	Joseph F. Bianco
Presiding Judge:	E. Thomas Boyle
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 8, 2012	Filing 54 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted on all claims. Specifically, the uncontroverted facts demonstrate that, under the totality of the circumstances test, plaintiff signed the Release Agreement with the Bank voluntarily and knowingly, and therefore released, inter alia, all of the claims she asserts in this action. In an abundance of caution, however , the Court has analyzed the merits of the plaintiff's claims and concludes that, construing the evidence most favorably to the plaintiff and drawing all inferences in her favor, no rational jury could find that any of these acts were motivated by discriminatory animus or were retaliation for plaintiff filing an EEOC complaint. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. The Court has mailed a copy of the Memorandum and Order to the plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 8/8/2012. (Weber, Rebecca)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 8, 2012

Filing 54 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted on all claims. Specifically, the uncontroverted facts demonstrate that, under the totality of the circumstances test, plaintiff signed the Release Agreement with the Bank voluntarily and knowingly, and therefore released, inter alia, all of the claims she asserts in this action. In an abundance of caution, however , the Court has analyzed the merits of the plaintiff's claims and concludes that, construing the evidence most favorably to the plaintiff and drawing all inferences in her favor, no rational jury could find that any of these acts were motivated by discriminatory animus or were retaliation for plaintiff filing an EEOC complaint. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. The Court has mailed a copy of the Memorandum and Order to the plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 8/8/2012. (Weber, Rebecca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neal v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank
Represented By:	Frederic L. Lieberman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?