Manney et al v. Intergroove Tontrager Vertriebs GMBH et al
| Joseph Leonardo and Steven Manney |
| Intergroove Tontrager Vertriebs GMBH, Intergroove U.S. Inc., Eva Matthias and Peter Matthias |
| 2:2010cv04493 |
| October 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Sandra J. Feuerstein |
| William D. Wall |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
OPINION & ORDER denying 63 Motion for Reconsideration re 44 Judgment, see court file for documents not filed electronically due to volume. SO ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure see king reconsideration of the September 28, 2012 order is denied in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court shall serve notice of entry of this Order on all parties in accordance with Rule 77(d)(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. CM to pro se plaintiffs. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 3/24/2014. (Florio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
61
OPINION & ORDER denying 48 Motion for Reconsideration re 44 Judgment. SO ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is denied in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court shall serve notice of entry of this Order on all parties in accordance with Rule 77(d)(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including mailing a copy of the Order to the pro se plaintiffs at their last known address. CM to pro se plaintiffs. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 9/28/2012. (Florio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
43
OPINION & ORDER: SO ORDERED that the branches of lntergroove Germany's and the Matthias defts' 13 , 19 , and 33 motions seeking dismissal of this action based upon plaintiffs' lack of legal capacity to sue are granted, the action i s dismissed in its entirety without prejudice and the motions are otherwise denied as moot. Plaintiffs' 6 motion for a remand is likewise denied as moot. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of defts, to close this cas e and to serve notice of entry of this Order on all parties in accordance with Rule 77 (d)( 1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including mailing a copy of the Order to the pro se plaintiffs at their last known address. CM to pro se plaintiffs on 12/2/2011. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 11/30/2011. (Glueckert, Lisa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
