Chery v. Communication Workers - CWA 1104
Plaintiff: Jean Chery
Defendant: Communication Workers - CWA 1104
Case Number: 2:2011cv00427
Filed: January 28, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: E. Thomas Boyle
Presiding Judge: Sandra J. Feuerstein
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER granting 31 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. SO ORDERED that deft's motion is granted and this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rules 37(b)(2)(a)(v) and 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for pl aintiff's failure to comply with the June 5, 2012 Order and to prosecute this action. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of deft, to close this case and, in accordance with Rule 77(d)(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil P rocedure, to serve notice of entry of this Order upon the parties, including mailing a copy of this Order to plaintiff's address of record and leaving a copy of this Order with the Clerk of the Court. CM to pro se plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 8/1/2012. (Florio, Lisa)
June 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER denying 14 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. SO ORDERED that (1) deft's motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12( c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is denied without prejudice to renewal as a motion for summ ary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in accordance with this Order; and (2) plaintiff is directed to serve and file an affidavit on or before July 9, 2012 either (a) indicating that the contact information on recor d with the Court, i.e., 24 Bridle Path, Randolph, MA 02368, (347) 438-2255, remains the correct address and telephone number at which the Court and deft can contact him during the pendency of this proceeding, or (b) providing the Court with a new add ress and telephone number at which he can be contacted, or the complaint will be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Rules 37(b)(2)(A)(v) and 4l(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Pursuant to Rule 77(d)(l) of the Federal Rul es of Civil Procedure, the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve notice of entry of this order upon all parties in accordance with Rule 5(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including mailing a copy of this order to plaintiffs address of record pursuant to Rule 5(b)(C) and leaving a copy of this order with the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Rule 5(b )(2)(D). CM to pro se plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 6/5/2012. (Florio, Lisa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chery v. Communication Workers - CWA 1104
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jean Chery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Communication Workers - CWA 1104
Represented By: Sumanth Bollepalli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?