Robles v. Cox and Company, Inc.

Robles v. Cox and Company, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Carmen Robles
Defendant:	Cox and Company, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2011cv01975
Filed:	April 21, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Arthur D. Spatt
Presiding Judge:	William D. Wall
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 23, 2013	Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED, that the Defendants 29 motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 is granted in its entirety. The Plaintiffs Complaint is dismissed in its entirety and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 11/23/13. (Coleman, Laurie)
January 10, 2012	Filing 11 MEMORANDUM of DECISION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 3 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Deft's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the NYCHRL discrimination claim is granted, and it is further ORDERED, that the Def t's Rule l2(b)(l) motion to dismiss the Title VII retaliation claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is denied, and it is further ORDERED, that the Deft's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the Title VII retaliation claim for fai lure to state a claim is granted, ORDERED, that the Deft's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the Plaintiff's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is granted, and it is further ORDERED, that the Deft's Rule 12(b)(6) moti on to dismiss the Plaintiffs breach of contract claim is granted, and it is further ORDERED, that the Plaintiff is afforded twenty days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint as to the causes of action dismissed herein. Ordered by Senior Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 1/10/2012. (Florio, Lisa)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 23, 2013

Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED, that the Defendants 29 motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 is granted in its entirety. The Plaintiffs Complaint is dismissed in its entirety and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 11/23/13. (Coleman, Laurie)

January 10, 2012

Filing 11 MEMORANDUM of DECISION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 3 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Deft's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the NYCHRL discrimination claim is granted, and it is further ORDERED, that the Def t's Rule l2(b)(l) motion to dismiss the Title VII retaliation claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is denied, and it is further ORDERED, that the Deft's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the Title VII retaliation claim for fai lure to state a claim is granted, ORDERED, that the Deft's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the Plaintiff's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is granted, and it is further ORDERED, that the Deft's Rule 12(b)(6) moti on to dismiss the Plaintiffs breach of contract claim is granted, and it is further ORDERED, that the Plaintiff is afforded twenty days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint as to the causes of action dismissed herein. Ordered by Senior Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 1/10/2012. (Florio, Lisa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robles v. Cox and Company, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Cox and Company, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carmen Robles
Represented By:	Adeline Ellis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?