Spread Enterprises. Inc v. First Data Merchant Services Corporation et al
| Spread Enterprises. Inc |
| Wells Fargo Bank N A, Bankcard Brokers, Inc. and First Data Merchant Services Corporation |
| 2:2011cv04743 |
| September 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| E. Thomas Boyle |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Default |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
162
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - It is hereby: ORDERED that the Plaintiffs 136 motion to certify a class pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 is denied; and it is further ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 2/22/2014. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 113 Motion to Compel: For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiff's motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, plaintiff's motion is granted with respect to the emai ls contained in plaintiff's Exhibits 2 and 15 through 19 and defendant First Data Merchant Services Corporation is directed to produce unredacted copies of those emails to plaintiff within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. In all other respects, plaintiff's motion is denied. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 2/19/2013. (Suarez, Stephanie)
|
|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED, that the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.As motion for joinder to the motion for judgment on the pleadings by the Defendant First Data Merchant Services Corporation is granted; and it is further ORDERED, that the Defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the plaintiffs claim for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing is granted; and it is further ORDERED, that the Defendants motion for judgment on the pleadin gs dismissing the plaintiffs claim for unjust enrichment is granted; and it is further ORDERED, that the Defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the plaintiffs claim for violations of New York General Business Law § 349 is granted. Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 8/22/2012. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
