van Bourgondien-Langeveld et al v. van Bourgondien et al
Plaintiff: Marie-Jose Van Bourgondien, Mark Philip van Bourgondien, Petrus Karolus van Bourgondien and Johanna Maria Anna van Bourgondien-Langeveld
Defendant: John Frederick van Bourgondien and Joseph Peter van Bourgondien
Case Number: 2:2012cv01272
Filed: March 14, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: E. Thomas Boyle
Presiding Judge: Denis R. Hurley
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER re 37 Letter filed by Mark Philip van Bourgondien, Petrus Karolus van Bourgondien, Marie-Jose Van Bourgondien, Johanna Maria Anna van Bourgondien-Langeveld: Plaintiffs' letter application dated February 26, 2013, requesting a furthe r extension of time to effect service in connection with their motion to hold defendant John Frederick Van Bourgondien in contempt is denied as untimely. The motion for contempt initiated by order to show cause dated May 17, 2012 is terminated. This termination is without prejudice to renewal. Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 3/4/2013. (Minerva, Deanna)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: van Bourgondien-Langeveld et al v. van Bourgondien et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marie-Jose Van Bourgondien
Represented By: Matthew Jason Weldon
Represented By: Martin Frederik Gusy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Philip van Bourgondien
Represented By: Martin Frederik Gusy
Represented By: Matthew Jason Weldon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Petrus Karolus van Bourgondien
Represented By: Martin Frederik Gusy
Represented By: Matthew Jason Weldon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Johanna Maria Anna van Bourgondien-Langeveld
Represented By: Martin Frederik Gusy
Represented By: Matthew Jason Weldon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Frederick van Bourgondien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Peter van Bourgondien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?