Bank Of America, N.A. v. Ticor Title Insurance Company
||Bank Of America, N.A.
||Ticor Title Insurance Company
||August 30, 2012
||New York Eastern District Court
||Central Islip Office
||Joseph F. Bianco
||William D. Wall
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28:1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 7, 2015
ORDER granting 98 Motion for Reconsideration re 98 Letter MOTION for Order of Sale MOTION for Reconsideration of Order Extending Duration of Rule 68 Offer and request for settlement conference including prnncipals of all parties filed by INET National Land Services, LLC, Dana Sharon, 97 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 89 Notice(Other) Offer of Judgment filed by Ticor Title Insurance Company, Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, 90 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference re 25 Answer to Crossclaim, 24 Answer to Third Party Complaint, Counterclaim seeking leave to amend to assert cross-claims and Status Report per Order dated F ebruary 20, 2015 filed by INET National Land Services, LLC, Dana Sharon, Set/Reset Hearings, 92 MOTION for pre motion conference re 91 Status Report, 90 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference re 25 Answer to Crossclaim, 24 Answer to Third Party Complaint, Counterclaim seeking leave to amend to assert cross-claims and Status MOTION to Sever filed by Ticor Title Insurance Company. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 4/7/2015. (Shields, Anne)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.