Cargulia et al v. Amadeo et al
Andrew Cargulia, II and Gotham Surgical Products Corporation |
Joseph Amadeo, Andrea Mueller and United Biotech Corporation |
2:2013cv00712 |
February 7, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
E. Thomas Boyle |
Joanna Seybert |
Stockholders Suits |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ORDER It is hereby Ordered that On or before August 2, 2013, the undersigned will give the plaintiffs one final opportunity to show cause in writing why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. If the plaintiffs fails to comply wit h this order, the undersigned will immediately recommend to Judge Seybert that the action be dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to the factors set forth in LeSane v. Halls Security Analyst, Inc., 239 F.3d 206 (2d Cir. 2001). The result of a dismissa l with prejudice, should Judge Seybert accept the recommendation, would be the final disposition of the plaintiffs claims against the defendant in this lawsuit, subject only to an appeal to the Second Circuit. The plaintiff is strongly urged to consider this result in weighing his options, and to appear for the conference as ordered. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 7/18/2013. (Imrie, Robert) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.