Board of Trustees of the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 174 Commercial Pension Fund v. The Standard Casing Company, Inc.

Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 174 Commercial Pension Fund
Defendant: The Standard Casing Company, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2013cv01695
Filed: March 29, 2013
Court: New York Eastern District Court
Office: Central Islip Office
Referring Judge: E. Thomas Boyle
Presiding Judge: Sandra J. Feuerstein
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Board of Trustees of the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 174 Commercial Pension Fund v. The Standard Casing Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 174 Commercial Pension Fund
Represented By: Ira D. Wincott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Standard Casing Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.