Marlin Business Bank v. The Halland Companies LLC
| Marlin Business Bank |
| The Halland Companies LLC |
| Andrew Fenton, Long Island Business Solutions, Inc. and Newport Business Solutions, Inc. |
| Marlin Business Bank |
| The Halland Companies LLC |
| The Halland Companies LLC |
| 2:2014cv02382 |
| April 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Gary R. Brown |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
DECISION AND ORDER - In sum, the Court grants that portion of the Plaintiffs motion remanding this case to the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas and directs the Clerk of the Court to close this case. Further, the Court finds that Defendants r emoval of this case was objectively unreasonable under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). However, the Court finds that the submissions of the Plaintiffs counsel relating to the expenses incurred are insufficient. Therefore, the Court denies without prejudice with leave to renew that part of the Plaintiffs motion seeking costs and attorneys fees. The Plaintiffs counsel is given thirty days from the date of this order to supplement these submissions with regard to his expertise and the reasonable hourly rate for attorneys working in the Philadelphia area. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 5/7/2014. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
