Lipson v. Birch et al
| Scott Seymour Matthew Lipson |
| Robert J. Birch, Esq., P.C., Robert J. Birch and Carter Williamson |
| 2:2014cv02586 |
| April 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Gary R. Brown |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Dismiss - It is hereby: ORDERED, that the part of the motion by Birch and Williamson to dismiss the complaint as against them pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter ju risdiction is denied; and it is further ORDERED, that the part of the motion by Birch and Williamson to dismiss the complaint as against them pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction is granted; and it is further ORDER ED, that the complaint as against Birch and Williamson is dismissed without prejudice to renew in a jurisdiction over Birch and Williamson that may be obtained; and it is further ORDERED, that the Plaintiff is directed to a file an amended caption consistent with this Decision and Order within 10 days within the Date of this Decision and Order. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 9/23/2014. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
