FC Online Marketing, Inc. v. Burke's Martial Arts, LLC et al
Plaintiff: FC Online Marketing, Inc.
Defendant: John Jacob Burke and Burke's Martial Arts, LLC
Case Number: 2:2014cv03685
Filed: June 11, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Sandra J. Feuerstein
Presiding Judge: William D. Wall
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: For the reasons set forth herein, Magistrate Judge Locke's Report is accepted in its entirety and, for the reasons set for therein, defendants' motion for leave to file an amended answer and third party complaint is granted; defendants amended answer and third party complaint is accepted for filing nunc pro tunc; and FCOM's motion to strike the amended answer and third party complaint is denied. SO Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 10/25/2016. (Tirado, Chelsea)
July 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 62 OPINION & ORDER: SO ORDERED that (1) the branch of defts' motion seeking dismissal of plaintiffs trade dress claim pertaining to its Website pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is granted and so much of plaintiffs t rade dress claim as pertains to its Website is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice for failure to state a claim for relief; (2) the branch of defts' motion seeking dismissal of plaintiffs trade dress claim as pertains to its Store Trade Dre ss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is treated as a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and summary judgment is granted dismissing plaintiffs trade dress claim as pertains to its Store Trade Dress in its entirety with prejudice; (3) defts' motion pursuant to Rule 12(b )(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is otherwise denied; and (4) plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 502, 15 U.S.C. § 116 and Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is denied in its entirety. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 7/8/2015. (Florio, Lisa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FC Online Marketing, Inc. v. Burke's Martial Arts, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Jacob Burke
Represented By: Sara Decatur Judge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Burke's Martial Arts, LLC
Represented By: Sara Decatur Judge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FC Online Marketing, Inc.
Represented By: Carlos A. Leyva
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?