Bennett v. Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC et al
Kerry A. Bennett |
Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC and Does |
2:2014cv04433 |
July 23, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Denis R. Hurley |
Steven I. Locke |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : The Court adopts the January 5, 2017 Report and Recommendation of Judge Locke as if set forth herein. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that default judgment be entered (1) in favor of plaintiff against de fendant on the claims for violating sections 1692c and 1692d of the FDCPA, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692c &1692d, in the amount of $1,000.00 for statutory damages and $455.00 in costs; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for a default j udgment on the claim for violation of section 1692f of the FDCPA, 15 U.S.C. § 1692f, is denied and that plaintiff recover nothing of the defendant on that claim; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the request for attorneys fees is denied without pre judice to renew and with leave to submit further documentation or other evidence to allow the Court to assess the reasonableness of the hourly rates requested; any such renewed motion for attorneys fees must be made within the time provided for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2)(B). Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 1/31/2017. (Gapinski, Michele) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.