Kennedy v. Medgen, Inc.

Kennedy v. Medgen, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Stephen Kennedy
Defendant:	Medgen, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2014cv05843
Filed:	October 6, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Gary R. Brown
Presiding Judge:	Arthur D. Spatt
Nature of Suit:	Copyright
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 7, 2016	Filing 24 ADOPTION ORDER - On January 8, 2016, Judge Shields issued a 19 report recommending that the Court deny the Plaintiffs 12 motion without prejudice and with leave to renew upon the submission of additional information substantiating the Defendants alleged infringement of the Plaintiffs copyrighted image (the R&R). On January 21, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a letter motion styled as a motion for reconsideration, which appears to contain the additional information requested by Judge Shields in th e R&R. However, the Plaintiff did not file specific objections to Judge Shields R&R. Accordingly, the January 8, 2016 R&R is adopted in its entirety. The Court further denies the Plaintiffs 20 motion for reconsideration without prejudice and with leave to renew as a formal motion for default judgment as specified in the R&R. Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 3/7/2016. (Coleman, Laurie)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 7, 2016

Filing 24 ADOPTION ORDER - On January 8, 2016, Judge Shields issued a 19 report recommending that the Court deny the Plaintiffs 12 motion without prejudice and with leave to renew upon the submission of additional information substantiating the Defendants alleged infringement of the Plaintiffs copyrighted image (the R&R). On January 21, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a letter motion styled as a motion for reconsideration, which appears to contain the additional information requested by Judge Shields in th e R&R. However, the Plaintiff did not file specific objections to Judge Shields R&R. Accordingly, the January 8, 2016 R&R is adopted in its entirety. The Court further denies the Plaintiffs 20 motion for reconsideration without prejudice and with leave to renew as a formal motion for default judgment as specified in the R&R. Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 3/7/2016. (Coleman, Laurie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kennedy v. Medgen, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen Kennedy
Represented By:	Edward C. Greenberg
Represented By:	Tamara Lynn Lannin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Medgen, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?