Roth v. Farmingdale Public School District

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Roth v. Farmingdale Public School District

Roth v. Farmingdale Public School District

Plaintiff:	Jeff S Roth
Defendant:	Farmingdale Public School District
Case Number:	2:2014cv06668
Filed:	November 10, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Joseph F. Bianco
Presiding Judge:	Arlene R. Lindsay
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 30, 2017	Filing 84 ORDER granting 71 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated herein, the Court grants defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 71) as to plaintiff's federal Title VII, ADA, ADEA, First Amendment, and Fourteenth Amendment claims, and declines to exercise jurisdiction over plaintiff's remaining New York State law claims. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 1/30/2017. (Zbrozek, Alex)
February 26, 2016	Filing 49 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants in part and denies in part defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint. In an abundance of cauti on, the Court grants plaintiff leave to replead his Title VII, ADA, ADEA, and slander claims. In so doing, plaintiff must attempt to provide grounds for equitable tolling, and must allege how the events and incidents plaintiff describes in his compla int were taken on the basis of, or related to, plaintiff's protected status under Title VII, the ADEA, or the ADA. In repleading his state law slander claim, plaintiff must allege the time, place, and manner of the allegedly false statements, as well as to whom the statements were made. Any amended complaint shall be filed no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Plaintiff is cautioned that an amended complaint completely replaces the original, and therefore all allegatio ns and claims against all of the defendants that plaintiff wishes to pursue must be included in the amended complaint. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the Title VII, ADEA, ADA, and slander claims with prejudice. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 2/26/2016. (Dolecki, Lauren)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 30, 2017

Filing 84 ORDER granting 71 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated herein, the Court grants defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 71) as to plaintiff's federal Title VII, ADA, ADEA, First Amendment, and Fourteenth Amendment claims, and declines to exercise jurisdiction over plaintiff's remaining New York State law claims. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 1/30/2017. (Zbrozek, Alex)

February 26, 2016

Filing 49 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants in part and denies in part defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint. In an abundance of cauti on, the Court grants plaintiff leave to replead his Title VII, ADA, ADEA, and slander claims. In so doing, plaintiff must attempt to provide grounds for equitable tolling, and must allege how the events and incidents plaintiff describes in his compla int were taken on the basis of, or related to, plaintiff's protected status under Title VII, the ADEA, or the ADA. In repleading his state law slander claim, plaintiff must allege the time, place, and manner of the allegedly false statements, as well as to whom the statements were made. Any amended complaint shall be filed no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Plaintiff is cautioned that an amended complaint completely replaces the original, and therefore all allegatio ns and claims against all of the defendants that plaintiff wishes to pursue must be included in the amended complaint. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the Title VII, ADEA, ADA, and slander claims with prejudice. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 2/26/2016. (Dolecki, Lauren)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roth v. Farmingdale Public School District
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Farmingdale Public School District
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeff S Roth
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?