Saiyed v. Archon, Inc. et al
| Amjad Saiyed |
| Archon Distribution, Inc., Archon, Inc., John/Jane Does, Mohammed Ashif Gajra and Rashid Patel |
| 2:2014cv06862 |
| November 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Joanna Seybert |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
MEMORANDUM & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; For the foregoing reasons, Judge Lindsay's R&R (Docket Entry 71) is ADOPTED in its entirety. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Docket Entries 20, 22) is DENIED as to Archon Dist ribution, Inc. until the Court can inquire further into whether service of process was proper. Plaintiff's motion is also DENIED as to Archon, Inc. with leave to renew its motion along with a memorandum of law with applicable case law and argume nts in support. The Clerk of the Court is directed to VACATE the entry of default against Mohammed Ashif "Mike" Gajra and he is GRANTED twenty (20) days from the date of this Memorandum & Order to Answer. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 3/7/2016. C/ECF; C/M (Valle, Christine)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER re 59 , 63 , 70 : See attached order for details. The plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of the order on all defendants. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 2/3/2016. c/ecf (Miller, Dina)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
