Trustees of the United Plant and Production Workers Local 175 Benefit Funds v. American Paving & Masonry Corp et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Trustees of the United Plant and Production Workers Local 175 Benefit Funds v. American Paving & Masonry Corp et al

Trustees of the United Plant and Production Workers Local 175 Benefit Funds v. American Paving & Masonry Corp et al

Plaintiff:	Trustees of the United Plant and Production Workers Local 175 Benefit Funds
Defendant:	American Paving & Masonry Corp and Angelo Stanco
Case Number:	2:2015cv01223
Filed:	March 9, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Sandra J. Feuerstein
Presiding Judge:	Steven I. Locke
Nature of Suit:	Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 15, 2016	Filing 27 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: For the reasons set forth herein, Magistrate Judge Locke's Report is accepted in its entirety and, for the reasons set forth therein, plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rul e 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is denied with leave to renew following an evidentiary hearing before Magistrate Judge Locke on the issue of fraud in the execution, and specifically whether defendant Angelo Stanco had a reasonable opportunity to read the Assumption Agreement prior to execution. SO Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 9/15/2016. (Tirado, Chelsea)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 15, 2016

Filing 27 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: For the reasons set forth herein, Magistrate Judge Locke's Report is accepted in its entirety and, for the reasons set forth therein, plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rul e 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is denied with leave to renew following an evidentiary hearing before Magistrate Judge Locke on the issue of fraud in the execution, and specifically whether defendant Angelo Stanco had a reasonable opportunity to read the Assumption Agreement prior to execution. SO Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 9/15/2016. (Tirado, Chelsea)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trustees of the United Plant and Production Workers Local 175 Benefit Funds v. American Paving & Masonry Corp et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: American Paving & Masonry Corp
Represented By:	Joel M. Sunshine
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Angelo Stanco
Represented By:	Joel M. Sunshine
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees of the United Plant and Production Workers Local 175 Benefit Funds
Represented By:	Joseph Richard Bongiorno
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?