Speedfit LLC et al v. Chapco Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Aurel A. Astilean, NY and Speedfit LLC
Defendant: Chapco Inc., Brian Weinstein and Robert Weinstein
Case Number: 2:2015cv01323
Filed: March 13, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Steven I. Locke
Presiding Judge: Leonard D. Wexler
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court denies Defendants' motion to strike, but grants their motion for summary judgment. Because the Court has previously determined that Plaintiffs will be permitted to re cover only nominal damages in an amount no greater than $1.00 for their breach of contract claim, which is the only claim remaining, the parties shall inform the Court within thirty (30) days of this Order how they would like proceed in this case. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 9/21/2020. (Shi, Yi Qing)
February 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court denies both Plaintiffs' and Defendant Samsara's motions for reconsideration, but makes the corrections as set out in the Memorandum and Order to the September Order. The Court also dismisses all claims against Defendants Robert Weinstein and Brian Weinstein for failure to state a claim. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 2/14/2020. (Shi, Yi Qing)
September 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court affirms and adopts the well-reasoned Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the opinion of the Court and grants in part and denies defendants motion to dismiss the complaint. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 9/30/2016. (Ortiz, Grisel)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Speedfit LLC et al v. Chapco Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aurel A. Astilean, NY
Represented By: Thomas B. Decea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Speedfit LLC
Represented By: Thomas B. Decea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chapco Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Weinstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Weinstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?