Auto-Kaps, LLC v. Clorox Company

Auto-Kaps, LLC v. Clorox Company

Plaintiff:	Auto-Kaps, LLC
Defendant:	Clorox Company
Case Number:	2:2015cv01737
Filed:	April 1, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Brian M. Cogan
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 29, 2016	Filing 57 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER dated 11/29/16 granting defendant's 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant is directed to file a letter within 7 days containing the advice set forth above. ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 11/29/2016 ) *Forwarded for jgm. (Guzzi, Roseann)
March 22, 2016	Filing 46 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER dated 3/22/16 granting defendant's 39 Motion to Strike. A status conference will be held on April 5, 2016 at 4:30 in Courtroom 8D South to discuss whether plaintiff has retained a different expert for the purpose s of the summary judgment motion, or whether it intends to rely on the plain, ordinary meanings of the limitation terms, which is what it indicated it would do at the premotion conference. ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 3/22/2016 ) (Guzzi, Roseann)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 29, 2016

Filing 57 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER dated 11/29/16 granting defendant's 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant is directed to file a letter within 7 days containing the advice set forth above. ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 11/29/2016 ) *Forwarded for jgm. (Guzzi, Roseann)

March 22, 2016

Filing 46 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER dated 3/22/16 granting defendant's 39 Motion to Strike. A status conference will be held on April 5, 2016 at 4:30 in Courtroom 8D South to discuss whether plaintiff has retained a different expert for the purpose s of the summary judgment motion, or whether it intends to rely on the plain, ordinary meanings of the limitation terms, which is what it indicated it would do at the premotion conference. ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 3/22/2016 ) (Guzzi, Roseann)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Auto-Kaps, LLC v. Clorox Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Auto-Kaps, LLC
Represented By:	Jean-Marc Zimmerman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Clorox Company
Represented By:	Frederick L. Whitmer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?