Advance Fresh Concepts Franchise Corp. v. Nayyarsons Deli Bakery Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Advance Fresh Concepts Franchise Corp.
Defendant: Nayyarsons Corp., Nayyarsons Deli Bakery Corp. and Nayyarsons NYC Corp.
Case Number: 2:2015cv02330
Filed: April 23, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Gary R. Brown
Presiding Judge: Leonard D. Wexler
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 175 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re [169, 170] : The Court adopts the August 30, 2019 Report and Recommendation of Judge Brown as if set forth herein. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (1) the settlement agreement between plaintiff and defendant Salil Nayyar (Salil) is hereby confirmed and the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the settlement agreement; (2) plaintiffs motion for default judgment against against defendants Nayyarsons Deli Bakery Corp. (Del i Corp.), Nayyarsons NYC Corp. (NYC Corp.), and Nayyarsons Corp. is granted in the total amount of $499,245.04; and (3) the motion for a default judgment against defendant Salil Nayyar is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment against the Entity Defendants in the amount of $499,245.04, jointly and severally, together with post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, and to close this case. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 9/23/2019. (Gapinski, Michele)
September 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 125 ORDER denying 82 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 83 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. For the reasons stated herein, Defendants' motions to dismiss are denied. Defendants are free, however, to renew their arguments on motions for summary judgment upon the close of discovery. (Ordered by Judge Leonard D. Wexler on 9/19/2016.) (Fagan, Linda)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Advance Fresh Concepts Franchise Corp. v. Nayyarsons Deli Bakery Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Advance Fresh Concepts Franchise Corp.
Represented By: Joseph Aronauer
Represented By: Grant Nigolian
Represented By: John C. Re
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nayyarsons Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nayyarsons Deli Bakery Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nayyarsons NYC Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?