Capricorn Management Systems, Inc. v. Government Employees Insurance Co.
Plaintiff: Capricorn Management Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Government Employees Insurance Co.
Case Number: 2:2015cv02926
Filed: May 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Denis R. Hurley
Presiding Judge: Steven I. Locke
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 169 MEMORANDUM DECISION dated 6/21/23 that the Court concludes that the scope of Count I is limited to whether GEICO used Supercede and its modules outside of New York and, if so, whether this conduct violated the LRA. Capricorn will not be permitted to argue at trial that GEICO misappropriated its trade secrets or wrongly disclosed its confidential information.The parties shall appear for a status conference on July 17, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. at the Theodore Roosevelt United States Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza, Brooklyn, New York, 11201. ( Ordered by Circuit Judge VJ-Denny Chin on 6/21/2023 ) (RG)
March 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 138 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; granting 103 Motion to Strike ; denying 105 Motion for Sanctions; granting in part and denying in part 107 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 121 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations as to 127 Report and Recommendations: The Court rejects the parties' objections and adopts Judge Locke's R &R in toto. Accordingly, the motion to strike Plaintiff's purported expert disclosures and exclude expert testimony is granted; the motion for sanctions is denied; and the motion for summary judgment is granted as to Counts II, III, and IV of the Amended Complaint, but denied as to Count I. Finally, the Court notes that GEICO has not renewed the motion to file certain documents under seal (DE 109). To the extent it wishes to renew that motion, it must file said application, addressed to Judge Locke, on or before April 30, 2020. In the event such application is not made, the Clerk of Court will be directed to unseal the documents filed at docket entry number 109. See attached memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 3/16/2020. (Gapinski, Michele)
April 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER denying 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: See attached Memorandum & Order. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 4/6/2016. (Gapinski, Michele)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Capricorn Management Systems, Inc. v. Government Employees Insurance Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Capricorn Management Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Jess M. Collen
Represented By: Thomas Phillip Gulick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Government Employees Insurance Co.
Represented By: Marisa Antos-Fallon
Represented By: Clifford Thau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?